Mintz v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 6, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2009-1894·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

EDWARD MINTZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1894 (PLF)

)

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ) CORPORATION, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is

hereby

ORDERED that [8] defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint is

GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that [9] defendant’s motion that the Court take judicial

notice and [14] plaintiff’s motion to stay are DENIED as moot; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that FURTHER ORDERED that this case is

DISMISSED. This is a final appealable Order. See FED . R. APP . P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/_______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: August 6, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mintz v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, (D.D.C. 2010).

Mintz v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Mintz v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.