Mintz v. Barthelemy

891 F.2d 520
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mintz v. Barthelemy. Read the opinion of the Court — 891 F.2d 520
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1990·No. 89-3678·Published

Opinion

891 F.2d 520

Donald R. MINTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sidney BARTHELEMY, William J. Guste, Jr., in his Capacity as
Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, and
The Supervisory Committee on Campaign
Finance Disclosure,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-3678.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1990.

George C. Freeman, III, Phillip A. Wittmann, Richard C. Stanley, David K. Hall, Stone, Pigman, Walther, Wittmann, & Hutchinson, New Orleans, LA., for plaintiff-appellant.

Morton H. Katz, Russ M. Herman, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, Julian R. Murray and Okla Jones, III, City Atty., Murray and Braden, New Orleans, LA., for Barthelemy.

Dale Charles Wilks, New Orleans, LA., John Neely Kennedy, Sp. Counsel to the Governor, Baton Rouge, LA., Jeffery Mark Lynch, Louisiana Dept. of Justice, New Orleans, LA., for Guste.

Wilson & Sexton, John Neely Kennedy, Sp. Counsel to the Governor, Office of the Governor, R. Gray Sexton, Executive Secretary, Louisiana Ethics Admin. Program, Baton Rouge, LA., for Supervisory Committee, etc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before THORNBERRY, JOHNSON, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

Affirmed on the basis of the district court's opinion at 722 F.Supp. 273 (E.D.La.1989).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mintz v. Barthelemy, 891 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1990).

891 F.2d 520 (Mintz v. Barthelemy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mintz v. Barthelemy
722 F. Supp. 273 (E.D. Louisiana, 1989)
Mintz v. Barthelemy
891 F.2d 520 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)