M'Intyre v. Woods

New York Supreme Court

M'Intyre v. Woods

5 Johns. 357

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1810

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Johns. 357 (M'Intyre v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Intyre v. Woods, 5 Johns. 357 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Before the passing of the statute, we intimated, in the case of Tillman v. Lansing, (4 Johns. Rep. 45.) that we would stay the execution against the sheriff, to give him an opportunity to sue on the bond taken for the gaol liberties. The delay which has taken, place does not appear to have been unreasonable. The rule ought, therefore, to be granted. The sheriff is not liable to pay interest to the plaintiff.

Rule granted»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Before the passing of the statute, we intimated, in the case of Tillman v. Lansing, (4 Johns. Rep. 45.) that we would stay the execution against the sheriff, to give him an opportunity to sue on the bond taken for the gaol liberties. The delay which has taken, place does not appear to have been unreasonable. The rule ought, therefore, to be granted. The sheriff is not liable to pay interest to the plaintiff.

Rule granted»

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Johns. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mintyre-v-woods-nysupct-1810.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack