M'Intyre v. Woods

New York Supreme Court

M'Intyre v. Woods

5 Johns. 357

New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Before the passing of the statute, we intimated, in the case of Tillman v. Lansing, (4 Johns. Rep. 45.) that we would stay the execution against the sheriff, to give him an opportunity to sue on the bond taken for the gaol liberties. The delay which has taken, place does not appear to have been unreasonable. The rule ought, therefore, to be granted. The sheriff is not liable to pay interest to the plaintiff.

Rule granted»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Before the passing of the statute, we intimated, in the case of Tillman v. Lansing, (4 Johns. Rep. 45.) that we would stay the execution against the sheriff, to give him an opportunity to sue on the bond taken for the gaol liberties. The delay which has taken, place does not appear to have been unreasonable. The rule ought, therefore, to be granted. The sheriff is not liable to pay interest to the plaintiff.

Rule granted»

M'Intyre v. Woods, 5 Johns. 357 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

5 Johns. 357 (M'Intyre v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related