Minto v. Bauer

New York Supreme Court

Minto v. Bauer

29 N.Y. St. Rep. 366

DecidedJanuary 24, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 366 (Minto v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minto v. Bauer, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 366 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, by* his stipulation, admitting that the court would be justified in sustaining the order appealed from, so far .as it affects the lien of the attorney, the judgment heretofore rendered by the general term is modified so that it should affirm the order appealed from as to the attorney’s right to-proceed for his agreed compensation; and the order should, therefore, be reversed in the other respects mentioned in the previous, opinion.

Yan Brunt, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, by* his stipulation, admitting that the court would be justified in sustaining the order appealed from, so far .as it affects the lien of the attorney, the judgment heretofore rendered by the general term is modified so that it should affirm the order appealed from as to the attorney’s right to-proceed for his agreed compensation; and the order should, therefore, be reversed in the other respects mentioned in the previous, opinion.

Yan Brunt, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.Y. St. Rep. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minto-v-bauer-nysupct-1890.