Minthorne v. Tompkins
This text of 2 Paige Ch. 102 (Minthorne v. Tompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
decided that the-lllth rule "did not apply to the case of a sale under ah interlocutory order of the court; that in .such a case, the 'deed might be executed beforeenrolment. But-if the decree was final as to the whole subject matter of the sale, that it must be enrolled before any. conveyance could be executed ¡ although, as to other branches of the suit, another decree might be necessary before the cause was finally disposed of by the court. And that if a bill was dismissed with costs as to one defendant, the decree must be enrolled be[103]*103fore any execution could issue thereon. And that the enrolment of any subsequent decree between other parties, or as to other matters, must be made by a continuance on the record of the first enrolment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Paige Ch. 102, 1830 N.Y. LEXIS 423, 1830 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minthorne-v-tompkins-nychanct-1830.