Minter v. Reid

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Minter v. Reid

237 S.E.2d 632, 143 Ga. App. 92, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2198

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 13, 1977

Docket54163

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 S.E.2d 632 (Minter v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minter v. Reid, 237 S.E.2d 632, 143 Ga. App. 92, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2198 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

For the third time this fraud and deceit case is before us. In 1975 (Minter v. Reid, 135 Ga. App. 763 (219 SE2d 15)), we remanded for noncompliance with Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a), requiring the trial judge in a nonjury trial to [93]*93make findings of fact and conclusions of law. The sole issue in the second appeal (Reid v. Minter, 137 Ga. App. 799 (224 SE2d 849) (1976)), was adequacy of the awarded damages, judgment having been entered for $1 actual damages, $1 punitive damages and court costs. We reversed, holding that the damages were so inadequate as to suggest gross mistake or undue bias.

Argued July 6, 1977 Decided July 13, 1977 Rehearing denied July 28, 1977 W. M. Mathews, Jr., for appellants.

Upon retrial before a jury the parties presented evidence on the question of damages alone, liability not being in issue, and judgment was entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Reid in the amount of $6,500 general damages, $1,200 punitive damages and $4,000 expenses of litigation. In this appeal from that judgment, enumerations of error as to issues other than damages cannot be determined. Constitutional questions (Code Ann. § 2-3104) and assertions of error regarding instructions to the jury to which no objections were made are not properly before this court. Code Ann. §70-207 (a), (c); Sullens v. Sullens, 236 Ga. 645, 646 (224 SE2d 921) (1976).

We have considered all complaints as to measure and amount of damages and attorney fees, however, and find no reversible error. McMichen v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, 128 Ga. App. 482 (197 SE2d 395) (1973); Maloy v. Dixon, 127 Ga. App. 151, 155 (2b) (193 SE2d 19) (1972); Windsor Forest, Inc. v. Rocker, 115 Ga. App. 317, 322 (2) (154 SE2d 627) (1967).

"Where a jury returns a verdict and it has the approval of the trial judge, the same must be affirmed on appeal if there is any evidence to support it as the jurors are the sole and exclusive judges of the weight and credit given the evidence. [Cits.]” Taylor v. Ga. Power Co., 136 Ga. App. 412, 413 (1) (221 SE2d 222) (1975). The evidence here was ample to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur. Roger W. Moister, Jr., for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb, Judge.

For the third time this fraud and deceit case is before us. In 1975 (Minter v. Reid, 135 Ga. App. 763 (219 SE2d 15)), we remanded for noncompliance with Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a), requiring the trial judge in a nonjury trial to [93]*93make findings of fact and conclusions of law. The sole issue in the second appeal (Reid v. Minter, 137 Ga. App. 799 (224 SE2d 849) (1976)), was adequacy of the awarded damages, judgment having been entered for $1 actual damages, $1 punitive damages and court costs. We reversed, holding that the damages were so inadequate as to suggest gross mistake or undue bias.

Argued July 6, 1977 Decided July 13, 1977 Rehearing denied July 28, 1977 W. M. Mathews, Jr., for appellants.

Upon retrial before a jury the parties presented evidence on the question of damages alone, liability not being in issue, and judgment was entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Reid in the amount of $6,500 general damages, $1,200 punitive damages and $4,000 expenses of litigation. In this appeal from that judgment, enumerations of error as to issues other than damages cannot be determined. Constitutional questions (Code Ann. § 2-3104) and assertions of error regarding instructions to the jury to which no objections were made are not properly before this court. Code Ann. §70-207 (a), (c); Sullens v. Sullens, 236 Ga. 645, 646 (224 SE2d 921) (1976).

We have considered all complaints as to measure and amount of damages and attorney fees, however, and find no reversible error. McMichen v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, 128 Ga. App. 482 (197 SE2d 395) (1973); Maloy v. Dixon, 127 Ga. App. 151, 155 (2b) (193 SE2d 19) (1972); Windsor Forest, Inc. v. Rocker, 115 Ga. App. 317, 322 (2) (154 SE2d 627) (1967).

"Where a jury returns a verdict and it has the approval of the trial judge, the same must be affirmed on appeal if there is any evidence to support it as the jurors are the sole and exclusive judges of the weight and credit given the evidence. [Cits.]” Taylor v. Ga. Power Co., 136 Ga. App. 412, 413 (1) (221 SE2d 222) (1975). The evidence here was ample to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur. Roger W. Moister, Jr., for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 S.E.2d 632, 143 Ga. App. 92, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minter-v-reid-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack