Minter v. City of Grand Rapids
This text of 741 N.W.2d 833 (Minter v. City of Grand Rapids) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dorothy MINTER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS and John Edward-Rheem Wetzel, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2007 judgment *834 of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument during the January 2008 session on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals majority correctly applied Kreiner v. Fischer, 471 Mich. 109, 683 N.W.2d 611 (2004), in partially reversing the Kent Circuit Court's order granting the defendants' motion for summary disposition. The parties may file supplemental briefs no later than January 4, 2008, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
741 N.W.2d 833, 480 Mich. 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minter-v-city-of-grand-rapids-mich-2007.