Minter & Radney v. Bush
This text of 62 S.E. 731 (Minter & Radney v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Strictness of pleading is not required, in setting out the cause of action in a ease instituted in a justice’s court. G. S. & F. Ry. Co. v. Barfield, 1 Ga. App. 203 (58 S. E. 236).
2. It is no objection to a verdict in a suit for injury to personalty that it. is less than the lowest amount of damage proved by the plaintiff, and higher than the highest amount shown by the defendant’s proof on that subject. Town of Wrens v. Sammons, 129 Ga. 755 (59 S. E. 776), and cit.; Hawley Down Draft Furnace Co. v. Van Winkle Gin Works, 4 Ga. App. 85 (60 S. E. 1008).
3. The trial was free from error. The evidence authorized the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 S.E. 731, 5 Ga. App. 129, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minter-radney-v-bush-gactapp-1908.