Minsky v. Leibowitz

200 Misc. 900, 111 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2830
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 13, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Nova, J.

The plaintiffs in a personal injury action seek to examine the defendant before trial. The facts indicate that they were passengers in the automobile driven and owned by their son-in-law, the defendant. Objection is raised to the examination because of the close relationship existing between the parties. It has been held in similar cases that such an examination should be denied (De George v. Pucci, N. Y. L. J., Dec. 8, 1948, p. 1451, col. 6 [Froessel, J.]; Horowitz v. Goodman, N. Y. L. J., May 21, 1941, p. 2284, col. 1 [Hooley, J.]). Accordingly the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minsky v. Leibowitz, 200 Misc. 900, 111 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2830 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1951).

200 Misc. 900 (Minsky v. Leibowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marks v. Nager
206 Misc. 744 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Gudz v. Good
201 Misc. 727 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)