Minsky v. Leibowitz
This text of 200 Misc. 900 (Minsky v. Leibowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs in a personal injury action seek to examine the defendant before trial. The facts indicate that they were passengers in the automobile driven and owned by their son-in-law, the defendant. Objection is raised to the examination because of the close relationship existing between the parties. It has been held in similar cases that such an examination should be denied (De George v. Pucci, N. Y. L. J., Dec. 8, 1948, p. 1451, col. 6 [Froessel, J.]; Horowitz v. Goodman, N. Y. L. J., May 21, 1941, p. 2284, col. 1 [Hooley, J.]). Accordingly the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 Misc. 900, 111 N.Y.S.2d 503, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minsky-v-leibowitz-nysupct-1951.