Minshew v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Minshew v. State

163 S.E. 312, 44 Ga. App. 798, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 522

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1932

Docket22085

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 312 (Minshew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minshew v. State, 163 S.E. 312, 44 Ga. App. 798, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under tlie facts of the case the exclusion of the testimony set forth in special ground 1 of the motion for a new trial, even if error, does not require a reversal of the judgment.

2. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in special ground 2 of the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the remainder of the charge, is not erroneous for any reason assigned.

[799]*799Decided February 17, 1932. McDonald & McDonald, for plaintiff in error. T. Hoyt Davis, solicitor-general, contra.

3. The remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial and the general grounds of the motion are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI