Minott v. Fishburne

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Minott v. Fishburne

48 S.E. 999, 69 S.C. 316, 1904 S.C. LEXIS 152

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 27, 1904·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The questions involved in this case are precisely the same as in Mary F. Lowndes v. Julian Fishburne, just filed. The different bonds held by Mary F. Lowndes and Harriott K. Minott were secured by the same *317 mortgage, and the claim of each for the alleged deficiency depended on precisely the same facts. In accordance with the opinion in Lowndes v. Fishburne, the judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The questions involved in this case are precisely the same as in Mary F. Lowndes v. Julian Fishburne, just filed. The different bonds held by Mary F. Lowndes and Harriott K. Minott were secured by the same *317 mortgage, and the claim of each for the alleged deficiency depended on precisely the same facts. In accordance with the opinion in Lowndes v. Fishburne, the judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Minott v. Fishburne, 48 S.E. 999, 69 S.C. 316, 1904 S.C. LEXIS 152 (S.C. 1904).

Pincite

48 S.E. 999 (Minott v. Fishburne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.