Minot v. Durant
7 Mass. 436
Opinion
We are all of opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover their proportion of the hire during the whole voyage. The defendant might have employed the vessel in the coasting trade during the continuance of the embargo. But separately from this consideration, parties must be bound by their contracts, if they will not provide against contingencies, as they may, and as the defendant did in this case as to other contingencies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minot v. Durant, 7 Mass. 436 (Mass. 1811).
7 Mass. 436 (Minot v. Durant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spafford v. Dodge
14 Mass. 66 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1817)