Minor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Fourth Circuit

Minor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

556 F. App'x 270

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2014·No. No. 13-2281·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman E. Minor appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on Minor’s claim that his [271] termination violated the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Minor v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:12-cv-01061-RWT (D.Md. July 16, 2013); see Foy v. Giant Food Inc., 298 F.3d 284, 287, 291 (4th Cir.2002). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman E. Minor appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on Minor’s claim that his [271] termination violated the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Minor v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:12-cv-01061-RWT (D.Md. July 16, 2013); see Foy v. Giant Food Inc., 298 F.3d 284, 287, 291 (4th Cir.2002). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Minor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 556 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

556 F. App'x 270 (Minor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related