Minor v. United States Parole Commission
This text of Minor v. United States Parole Commission (Minor v. United States Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) JOHN O. MINOR, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1438 (RMC) ) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner John O. Minor petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus because he allegedly
was confined at the District of Columbia Jail on a parole violator warrant beyond 90 days without
having received a parole revocation hearing. See Pet. [Dkt. # 1] at 5. The United States moves to
dismiss the petition on the ground that it is moot because Mr. Minor has been released to parole
supervision “and is no longer in BOP’s custody.” Resp’t Mot. [Dkt. # 9] at 1.
By Orders of February 6, 2009 [Dkt. # 10] and April 2, 2009 [Dkt. # 11], the Court
directed Mr. Minor to respond to the United States’s motion to dismiss and advised of the
consequences if he did not. The latter Order gave Mr. Minor until May 4, 2009, to file his response.
Mr. Minor has neither responded nor sought additional time to do so. The Court therefore will grant
the United States’s motion to dismiss as conceded. See LCvR 7(b). A separate Order of dismissal
accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Date: June 3, 2009 /s/ ROSEMARY M. COLLYER United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Minor v. United States Parole Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minor-v-united-states-parole-commission-dcd-2009.