Minor v. State
This text of 228 S.E.2d 33 (Minor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
B. L. Minor appeals his conviction of burglary of a residence.
1. Minor contends that the jury’s verdict was *169 contrary to the weight of the evidence. The weight of the evidence "is addressed to the trial court alone, not an appellate court . . . Even where an appellant proceeds directly by notice of appeal rather than by motion for new trial, the appellate courts undertake only to determine the sufficiency of the evidence, not to weigh it.” Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147, 149 (223 SE2d 131). The evidence here was amply sufficient to support the verdict.
2. There was no error in permitting a detective, the nominal prosecutor in the case, to testify after he had remained in the courtroom during testimony of other state witnesses. This practice is "almost universal.” Sparks v. State, 121 Ga. App. 115, 117 (173 SE2d 239); Tift v. State, 133 Ga. App. 455 (1) (211 SE2d 409).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 S.E.2d 33, 139 Ga. App. 168, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minor-v-state-gactapp-1976.