Minor v. Laboratory Corporation of America

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided December 30, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2013-1793·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LASHAWN MICHELLE MINOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1793 (ESH) ) LABORATORY CORPORATION OF ) AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )

ORDER

On November 20, 2013, defendant Laboratory Corporation of America filed a motion to

dismiss the complaint [ECF No. 5]. This Court issued an order directing the plaintiff, Lashawn

Michelle Minor, to respond to the motion to dismiss no later than December 20, 2013, and

informing her that if she did not timely respond, the motion could be deemed conceded under

Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b). (Order, Nov. 20, 2013 [ECF No. 7].) Plaintiff has not filed

any response to defendant’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED as conceded and

plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge

Date: December 30, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minor v. Laboratory Corporation of America, (D.D.C. 2013).

Minor v. Laboratory Corporation of America (Minor v. Laboratory Corporation of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.