Minor v. Hull

94 S.E. 808, 21 Ga. App. 623, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 440
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 22, 1918
Docket8898
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 808 (Minor v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Minor v. Hull, 94 S.E. 808, 21 Ga. App. 623, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 440 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Suit may be instituted against the heirs of an estate, where the estate has been distributed to them without notice of an existing debt, and the creditor may compel them to contribute pro rata to the payment of his debt. Civil Code (1910), § 3998. Such suit does not necessarily have to be instituted in a court of equity, but may be instituted in a court of law. Jones v. Parker, 55 Ga. 11; Jones v. Parker, 60 Ga. 500. Therefore the city court of Atlanta was not without jurisdiction to hear, determine, and render judgment in this case.

2. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers of the defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Parker
55 Ga. 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1875)
Jones v. Parker
60 Ga. 500 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 808, 21 Ga. App. 623, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minor-v-hull-gactapp-1918.