Minor v. Garrison

New York Supreme Court

Minor v. Garrison

4 Johns. 481

DecidedAugust 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Johns. 481 (Minor v. Garrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minor v. Garrison, 4 Johns. 481 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendants, in their affidavit, do not mention the number of their witnesses, nor whether they are material. The court cannot intend more than [482]*482one ; and the plaintiff swears that he has also a material witness residing in Albany. There is no preponderance in favour of the defendants, to induce the court to change the venue. They ought to have stated the number of witnesses, to enable the court to judge of the expediency of granting the motion.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendants, in their affidavit, do not mention the number of their witnesses, nor whether they are material. The court cannot intend more than [482]*482one ; and the plaintiff swears that he has also a material witness residing in Albany. There is no preponderance in favour of the defendants, to induce the court to change the venue. They ought to have stated the number of witnesses, to enable the court to judge of the expediency of granting the motion.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Johns. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minor-v-garrison-nysupct-1809.