Minor v. City of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Minor v. City of San Francisco

9 Cal. 39

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J.,. concurring.

The questions raised in this case are, in all essential particulars, the same as those decided in the case of Woods v. The City, (4 Cal., 190.) The learned counsel for plaintiff has sought to show a difference in the two cases; but has failed, in our judgment, to make it out. The reasons given, and the views expressed in the opinion .of the Court in that case are entirely applicable to the facts of this ease.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J.,. concurring.

The questions raised in this case are, in all essential particulars, the same as those decided in the case of Woods v. The City, (4 Cal., 190.) The learned counsel for plaintiff has sought to show a difference in the two cases; but has failed, in our judgment, to make it out. The reasons given, and the views expressed in the opinion .of the Court in that case are entirely applicable to the facts of this ease.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Minor v. City of San Francisco, 9 Cal. 39 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

9 Cal. 39 (Minor v. City of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related