Minor McNeil v. Asa Hutchinson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2023·No. 23-1319·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 23-1319

Minor Lee McNeil

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Asa Hutchinson, Governor and Chief Executive of Arkansas; Charles Collins, Commissioner of Revenue; Bryan West, Collections Manager; Carl F. Cooper, III, "Trey", Assistant Attorney General, State of Arkansas; Brent Dillon Houston, Judge

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

Submitted: June 12, 2023

Filed: June 23, 2023

[Unpublished]

Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Minor McNeil appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action related to state taxes. After careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the claims because they were barred by the Tax Injunction Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1341 (Tax Injunction Act); Diversified Ingredients, Inc. v. Testa, 846 F.3d 994, 995 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Lee P. Rudofsky, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minor McNeil v. Asa Hutchinson, (8th Cir. 2023).

Minor McNeil v. Asa Hutchinson (Minor McNeil v. Asa Hutchinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diversified Ingredients v. Joseph Testa
846 F.3d 994 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)