Minor, M. Jane v. Centocor Inc

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Minor, M. Jane v. Centocor Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 457 F.3d 632
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 7, 2006·No. 05-3080·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 August 4, 2006

Before

Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Chief Judge

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

M. JANE MINOR, Appeal from the United Plaintiff-Appellant, States District Court for the Central No. 05-3080 v. District of Illinois.

CENTOCOR, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., Nos. 02-3354 & 04-3114 Defendants-Appellees. Richard Mills, Judge.

Order

The opinion of this court issued on August 4, 2006, is amended as follows:

Page 3, full paragraph, line 7, “25%” should be changed to “20%”, so that the sentence reads: “That is functionally the same as a 20% reduction in Minor’s hourly pay, a material change by any standard.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minor, M. Jane v. Centocor Inc, (7th Cir. 2006).

Minor, M. Jane v. Centocor Inc (Minor, M. Jane v. Centocor Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.