Minns v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Minns v. Virginia

393 F. App'x 117

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2010·No. No. 10-1598·Published

Opinion

[118]*118Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

E. George Minns appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Minns v. Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00283-JRS-FBS, 2010 WL 1375266 (E.D. Va. April 1, 2010); (May 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[118]*118Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

E. George Minns appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Minns v. Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00283-JRS-FBS, 2010 WL 1375266 (E.D. Va. April 1, 2010); (May 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Minns v. Virginia, 393 F. App'x 117 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

393 F. App'x 117 (Minns v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related