Minnot v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Minnot v. State

414 So. 2d 1104, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29002

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1982·No. No. AH-261·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions on charges of attempted manslaughter and attempted burglary of a structure, finding that the asserted error at trial was not preserved for appellate review. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

However, as the parties agree, the trial judge erred at sentencing by imposing costs upon Minnot, who is indigent. See Arnold v. State, 356 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) and authorities cited therein.

Accordingly, judgment of conviction is affirmed, and this cause is remanded solely for correction of sentence. The appellant need not be present for this procedure.

BOOTH, WENTWORTH and WIGGIN-TON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions on charges of attempted manslaughter and attempted burglary of a structure, finding that the asserted error at trial was not preserved for appellate review. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

However, as the parties agree, the trial judge erred at sentencing by imposing costs upon Minnot, who is indigent. See Arnold v. State, 356 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) and authorities cited therein.

Accordingly, judgment of conviction is affirmed, and this cause is remanded solely for correction of sentence. The appellant need not be present for this procedure.

BOOTH, WENTWORTH and WIGGIN-TON, JJ., concur.

Minnot v. State, 414 So. 2d 1104, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29002 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

414 So. 2d 1104 (Minnot v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related