Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Minno v. Pro-Fab

Minno v. Pro-Fab

885 N.E.2d 954, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1496
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 7, 2008
Docket2008-0170
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 885 N.E.2d 954 (Minno v. Pro-Fab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Minno v. Pro-Fab, 885 N.E.2d 954, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1496 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 2007-T-0021, 2007-Ohio-6565. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minno v. Pro-Fab, Inc.
2009 Ohio 1247 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
885 N.E.2d 954, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minno-v-pro-fab-ohio-2008.