Minniti v. Minniti

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Minniti v. Minniti

445 So. 2d 665, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11906

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1984

DocketNo. 83-226

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 445 So. 2d 665 (Minniti v. Minniti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minniti v. Minniti, 445 So. 2d 665, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11906 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to hold that the award of the husband’s interest in the marital home to the wife as lump sum alimony constituted an abuse of discretion and therefore affirm that aspect of the judgment under review. Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Lopez v. Lopez, 438 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 392 So.2d 1378 (Fla.1981); Hague v. Hague, 382 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The wife has conceded error in the amounts of child support and the cause is consequently remanded for redetermination of that issue. Upon remand, the trial court will also be free to spell out any required details of the general terms of the “shared custody” provision of the final judgment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to hold that the award of the husband’s interest in the marital home to the wife as lump sum alimony constituted an abuse of discretion and therefore affirm that aspect of the judgment under review. Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Lopez v. Lopez, 438 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 392 So.2d 1378 (Fla.1981); Hague v. Hague, 382 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The wife has conceded error in the amounts of child support and the cause is consequently remanded for redetermination of that issue. Upon remand, the trial court will also be free to spell out any required details of the general terms of the “shared custody” provision of the final judgment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 So. 2d 665, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minniti-v-minniti-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack