Minnisink Oil Company, Incorporated v. Miller
180 A. 829, 115 N.J.L. 499, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 323
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKell, Rafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minnisink Oil Company, Incorporated v. Miller, 180 A. 829, 115 N.J.L. 499, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 323 (N.J. 1935).
180 A. 829 (Minnisink Oil Company, Incorporated v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.