Minniola O. Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 300 F.2d 760 (Minniola O. Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
300 F.2d 760
67-1 USTC P 9103
Minniola O. MILLER, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 178, Docket 26702.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Feb. 20, 1962.
Decided March 27, 1962.
Minniola O. Miller, pro se.
Richard J. Heiman, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
After having received one continuance, petitioner failed to appear for trial. The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 F.2d 760, 18 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5923, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minniola-o-miller-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca2-1962.