Minnifield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Minnifield v. State

530 So. 2d 249, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 23

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 8, 1988

Docket6 Div. 129

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 530 So. 2d 249 (Minnifield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minnifield v. State, 530 So. 2d 249, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 23 (Ala. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

McMILLAN, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court decision in Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609, modified on rehearing (Ala.1987), this cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct proceedings consistent with the guidelines adopted in the Branch opinion. The trial court is instructed to file findings of facts and conclusions with this Court within a reasonable time after the entry of this remand.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

ON RETURN TO REMAND

This cause was remanded to this court on authority of Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala.1987). Ex parte Minnifield, 530 So.2d 249 (Ala.1988). On the basis of that decision, this court on March 8, 1988, remanded this cause to the trial court in order to conduct a Branch hearing. On return to remand, the trial court nol-prossed this case on agreement of the parties. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

OPINION EXTENDED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMILLAN, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court decision in Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609, modified on rehearing (Ala.1987), this cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct proceedings consistent with the guidelines adopted in the Branch opinion. The trial court is instructed to file findings of facts and conclusions with this Court within a reasonable time after the entry of this remand.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

ON RETURN TO REMAND

This cause was remanded to this court on authority of Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala.1987). Ex parte Minnifield, 530 So.2d 249 (Ala.1988). On the basis of that decision, this court on March 8, 1988, remanded this cause to the trial court in order to conduct a Branch hearing. On return to remand, the trial court nol-prossed this case on agreement of the parties. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

OPINION EXTENDED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 So. 2d 249, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minnifield-v-state-alacrimapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack