Minnich's Estate

55 A. 1067, 206 Pa. 405, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 730
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 2, 1903·No. Appeal, No. 282·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Pee. Curiam,

The testatrix, it is true, as appellant claims, left him the entire net income of his share of her estate, without any devise over of the corpus after his death. But she put it in the hands of a trustee with active duties to perform in the payment of taxes and repairs if the devisee failed to do so, and with the express direction that “the same is not to be in anywise liable for any debts owing by my said son, nor for any debts that may be hereafter contracted by him.” This was a valid spendthrift trust which could not be allowed to be defeated by handing over the corpus of the estate to the control of the cestui que trust.

Decree affirmed at costs of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minnich's Estate, 55 A. 1067, 206 Pa. 405, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 730 (Pa. 1903).

55 A. 1067 (Minnich's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fellner Estate
48 Pa. D. & C.2d 625 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)
Bowers' Trust Estate
29 A.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Roberts' Estate
26 Pa. D. & C. 307 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1936)
Harrison's Estate
185 A. 766 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Harrison's Estate
25 Pa. D. & C. 133 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1935)
Rehr v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.
165 A. 380 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Hays's Estate
7 Pa. D. & C. 567 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1926)
Hartman's Estate
31 Pa. Super. 152 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Rockhill's Estate
29 Pa. Super. 28 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Shower's Estate
60 A. 789 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)