Minnfee v. Averitte
This text of Minnfee v. Averitte (Minnfee v. Averitte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT coURT " g FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA OCT l 5 2009
clerk, u.s. o' ~ Barry Dwayne Minnfee, : Bankruptc)l'séblf.lftasnd Plaintiff,
v. Misc. N0. Oq-
Magistrate Judge Clinton E. Averitte, Jr. : et al., '
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The plaintiff, a prisoner who is barred by 28 U.S.C. § l915(g) from initiating a civil action in this court without first paying the civil filing fee in full, has filed no complaint as such, but has filed a pro se "Petition for Special Redress or Per1nission [for] Other Relief" and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will deny the petition, deny the application to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the case.
Plaintiff seeks relief from the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (goveming persons proceeding in forma pauperis). He advances no particular reason, but simply argues that should be allowed access to the courts. A plaintiff barred by 28 U.S.C. § l915(g) from filing without first paying in full the filing fee can obtain relief from that provision by stating facts capable of supporting a finding that the plaintiff is "under imminent danger of serious physical
injuiy." 28 U.S.C. § l915(g) The plaintiff has made no such sho ' ccordingly, the
Date: d / nited §tates District Judge / » //7
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Minnfee v. Averitte, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minnfee-v-averitte-dcd-2009.