Minney v. City of Azusa
359 U.S. 436, 79 S. Ct. 941, 3 L. Ed. 2d 932, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1090
Opinion
MINNEY
v.
CITY OF AZUSA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Hayden C. Covington for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minney v. City of Azusa, 359 U.S. 436, 79 S. Ct. 941, 3 L. Ed. 2d 932, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1090 (1959).
359 U.S. 436 (Minney v. City of Azusa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shell Oil Co. v. City and County of San Francisco
139 Cal. App. 3d 917 (California Court of Appeal, 1983)
Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc.
32 Cal. App. 3d 488 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
Broadway Laguna, Vallejo Ass'n v. Board of Permit Appeals
427 P.2d 810 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Mullen
359 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1959)