Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Associated Press

Eighth Circuit

Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Associated Press

84 F. 921, 28 C.C.A. 566, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1975

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 31, 1898·No. No. 906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion filed in this case on January 17, 1898, to modify tbe order of affirmance herein so as to direct the dismissal of the bill without prejudice to the complainant’s right to sue at law, is denied for two reasons: First, because the majority. of the court are of opinion that the decree of the circuit court dismissing the cause of action on its merits was right; and, second, because the motion to modify the order of affirmance in this court was not filed until long after the term had lapsed at which the order of affirmance was entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion filed in this case on January 17, 1898, to modify tbe order of affirmance herein so as to direct the dismissal of the bill without prejudice to the complainant’s right to sue at law, is denied for two reasons: First, because the majority. of the court are of opinion that the decree of the circuit court dismissing the cause of action on its merits was right; and, second, because the motion to modify the order of affirmance in this court was not filed until long after the term had lapsed at which the order of affirmance was entered.

Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Associated Press, 84 F. 921, 28 C.C.A. 566, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1975 (8th Cir. 1898).

Pincite

84 F. 921 (Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Associated Press) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related