Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. v. Heipler

52 N.W. 33, 49 Minn. 395, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 188
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 3, 1892·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Mitchell, J.

By the terms of the order or draft sued on, the drawer directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff a certain sum.

The defendant. accepted the draft, expressly agreeing to pay the plaintiff the sum named. Clearly the plaintiff held the legal title to the demand, and was the real party in interest.

It did not concern the defendant that there was an agreement between the drawer and the plaintiff that the latter took the order only for collection; the proceeds, when collected, to be applied on-the indebtedness of the former to the latter.

No exceptions were taken on the trial of the cause which raise any cither question.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. v. Heipler, 52 N.W. 33, 49 Minn. 395, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 188 (Mich. 1892).

52 N.W. 33 (Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. v. Heipler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.
554 U.S. 269 (Supreme Court, 2008)
First State Bank of Ely v. Seliskar
211 N.W. 163 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Bush v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.
1922 OK 183 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
Baglin v. Earl-Eagle Mining Co.
184 P. 190 (Utah Supreme Court, 1919)
Citizens State Bank v. E. A. Tessman & Co.
140 N.W. 178 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
Stewart v. Price
64 L.R.A. 581 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1902)
Citizens' Bank v. Corkings
70 N.W. 1059 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1897)
Haupt Lumber Co. v. Westman
52 N.W. 33 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)