Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp.

12 A.D.2d 930, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 930 (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp., 12 A.D.2d 930, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

dant. Motion by plaintiff (respondent-appellant) to print and submit the appeal record in a series of volumes, the.first volume to contain the formal papers only, to wit, the pleadings, etc.; and for permission to file a lesser number of all the subsequent volumes, granted as follows: The record may be submitted in several volumes as requested; but the original and 19 copies of the first volume and the original and 4 copies of all subsequent volumes shall be filed with the Clerk of this court. Motion to seal so much of the printed appeal record as begins with volume two, granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

dant. Motion by plaintiff (respondent-appellant) to print and submit the appeal record in a series of volumes, the.first volume to contain the formal papers only, to wit, the pleadings, etc.; and for permission to file a lesser number of all the subsequent volumes, granted as follows: The record may be submitted in several volumes as requested; but the original and 19 copies of the first volume and the original and 4 copies of all subsequent volumes shall be filed with the Clerk of this court. Motion to seal so much of the printed appeal record as begins with volume two, granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 930, 211 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minnesota-mining-manufacturing-co-v-technical-tape-corp-nyappdiv-1961.