Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin

Supreme Court

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin

282 U.S. 833, 51 S. Ct. 105

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 U.S. 520 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 8, 1930·No. No. 543·Published

Opinion

The petition for a writ of certiorari in this case to the. Supreme Court of Minnesota is granted, limited to the question. arising [834]*834from the failure of the state court to grant a new trial in a case under the Federal- Employers’ Liability Act where the verdict was obtained by appeals to passion and prejudice.

Messrs. Henry S. Mitchell and John E. Palmer for petitioner. Messrs. Tom Davis and Ernest A. Michel for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for a writ of certiorari in this case to the. Supreme Court of Minnesota is granted, limited to the question. arising [834]*834from the failure of the state court to grant a new trial in a case under the Federal- Employers’ Liability Act where the verdict was obtained by appeals to passion and prejudice.

Messrs. Henry S. Mitchell and John E. Palmer for petitioner. Messrs. Tom Davis and Ernest A. Michel for respondent.

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin, 282 U.S. 833, 51 S. Ct. 105 (1930).

Pincite

282 U.S. 833 (Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.