Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. Alexander

239 U.S. 635, 36 S. Ct. 283
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 10, 1916·No. No. 148·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Missouri Pacific R. R. v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512; Minnesota & St. L. R. R. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26; Minnesota & St. L. R. R. v. Emmons, 149 U. S. 364; (3) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. Alexander, 239 U.S. 635, 36 S. Ct. 283 (1916).

239 U.S. 635 (Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Humes
115 U.S. 512 (Supreme Court, 1885)
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Beckwith
129 U.S. 26 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Emmons
149 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Cohen
234 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Overton v. Oklahoma
235 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
235 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1914)