Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Nash

242 U.S. 619, 37 S. Ct. 239
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 8, 1917·No. No. 421·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon -the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180. See Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Cousins, 241 U. S. 641. Mr. William H. Bremner and Mr. Frederick M. Miner for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Humphrey Barton for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Nash, 242 U.S. 619, 37 S. Ct. 239 (1917).

242 U.S. 619 (Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baloc v. Foley Bros.
68 F. Supp. 533 (D. Minnesota, 1946)
Slizik v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad
13 A.2d 911 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Brittain
93 F.2d 159 (Fifth Circuit, 1937)
Sheehan v. Terminal Railroad Assn.
81 S.W.2d 305 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
Gasser v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey
171 A. 97 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Kelly
51 S.W.2d 299 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1932)
Fenstermacher v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
274 S.W. 718 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1925)
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Chinn
137 N.E. 885 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1923)
Kinzell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
171 P. 1136 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1918)
Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Allen
249 F. 280 (Seventh Circuit, 1917)