Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Nash

Supreme Court

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Nash

242 U.S. 619, 37 S. Ct. 239

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 8, 1917

DocketNo. 421

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 242 U.S. 619 (Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Nash, 242 U.S. 619, 37 S. Ct. 239 (1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon -the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180. See Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Cousins, 241 U. S. 641. Mr. William H. Bremner and Mr. Frederick M. Miner for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Humphrey Barton for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment reversed with costs upon -the authority of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439; Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 239 U. S. 556; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 U. S. 177, 180. See Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Cousins, 241 U. S. 641. Mr. William H. Bremner and Mr. Frederick M. Miner for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Humphrey Barton for the defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 U.S. 619, 37 S. Ct. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minneapolis-st-louis-railroad-v-nash-scotus-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack