Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 332, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2112
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 2, 1965
DocketNo. 69105; protest 63/19091 (San Francisco)
StatusPublished
This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 332 (Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 332, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2112 (cusc 1965).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsbl that the merchandise consists of exposure meters, not built into the camera and not essential to the operation of the camera, and that said meters contain a system which is an electrical element essential to the operation of the meters, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
54 Cust. Ct. 332, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minneapolis-honeywell-regulator-v-united-states-cusc-1965.