Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 332, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2112
United States Customs Court·Decided March 2, 1965·No. No. 69105; protest 63/19091 (San Francisco)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsbl that the merchandise consists of exposure meters, not built into the camera and not essential to the operation of the camera, and that said meters contain a system which is an electrical element essential to the operation of the meters, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 332, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2112 (cusc 1965).
54 Cust. Ct. 332 (Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.