Minks v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad

184 Ill. App. 369
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 16, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 Ill. App. 369 (Minks v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Minks v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad, 184 Ill. App. 369 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Judgment, § 296*—jurisdiction to vacate judgment after appeal bond filed and approved. Where a judgment had been rendered for plaintiff in an action against a railroad company for a penalty for discrimination in freight rates, held that the trial court after an appeal bond had been filed and approved had jurisdiction during the term to vacate the judgment and order for the appeal for the purpose of granting plaintiff’s leave to make proof of the value of attorney’s fees, where such matter was overlooked when the judgment was rendered. 3. Judgments, § 296*—effect of order vacating judgment after appeal bond has been filed and approved. An order of court during the term vacating a judgment and order for an appeal after an appeal bond has been filed and approved for the purpose of permitting plaintiff to make proof of the value of attorney’s fees so as to be taxed as costs, terminates the appeal unless a new appeal bond is filed within the time limited by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Noble v. Langmade
168 P. 847 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 Ill. App. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minks-v-baltimore-ohio-southwestern-railroad-illappct-1913.