Minkowitz v. Ross
This text of 56 A.D.2d 863 (Minkowitz v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In consolidated actions (1) to recover damages and to [864]*864cancel a promissory note on the ground of fraud (Action No. 1) and (2) on the said note (Action No. 2), Harold J. Ross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 21, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, was in favor of Leonard Minkowitz in both actions, awarding him $7,500, plus interest, costs and disbursements, in Action No. 1, and dismissing the complaint in Action No. 2. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The trial court’s decision is supported by the record on this appeal. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 863, 392 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minkowitz-v-ross-nyappdiv-1977.