Minkoff v. Foxy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Minkoff v. Foxy, Inc.

3 A.D.2d 649, 158 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 649 (Minkoff v. Foxy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minkoff v. Foxy, Inc., 3 A.D.2d 649, 158 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Peck, P. J., Botein, Valente and Bergan, JJ. (Breitel, J., dissents and votes to reverse and remand for hearing, on the ground that in the present state of the record there is no contradiction of debtor’s averments that the date for the examination had been adjourned.) Appellant may purge himself of contempt by appearing for examination on date within five days after entry of order. Settle order fixing date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Peck, P. J., Botein, Valente and Bergan, JJ. (Breitel, J., dissents and votes to reverse and remand for hearing, on the ground that in the present state of the record there is no contradiction of debtor’s averments that the date for the examination had been adjourned.) Appellant may purge himself of contempt by appearing for examination on date within five days after entry of order. Settle order fixing date.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 649, 158 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minkoff-v-foxy-inc-nyappdiv-1957.