Minkner v. Camalag
This text of 249 A.D. 825 (Minkner v. Camalag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, in so far as it denies plaintiff’s motion to direct the entry of a deficiency judgment, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to try the issues, either before the court or a referee, and to make a finding of the fair and reasonable value of the premises. (See President, etc., of Manhattan Co. v. Premier Bldg. Corp., 247 App. Div. 297; Guardian Life Ins. Co. v. 205 State Corp., 248 id. 736; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Guttag Corp., 265 N. Y. 292; Heiman v. Bishop, 272 id. 83.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 825, 292 N.Y.S. 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minkner-v-camalag-nyappdiv-1937.