Minkin v. Maimonides Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Minkin v. Maimonides Hospital

54 A.D.2d 754, 387 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14412

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 754 (Minkin v. Maimonides Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minkin v. Maimonides Hospital, 54 A.D.2d 754, 387 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14412 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., defendants Maimonides Hospital and Howard Freedman appeal separately, as limited by their briefs, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 24, 1975, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against them, upon a jury verdict. The judgment also brings up for review the jury’s apportionment of liability at 80% against the appellant hospital and 20% against appellant Freedman. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable jointly by appellants. In our opinion there is sufficient evidence in the record to justify the verdicts against the appellants and the apportionment of liability. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., defendants Maimonides Hospital and Howard Freedman appeal separately, as limited by their briefs, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 24, 1975, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against them, upon a jury verdict. The judgment also brings up for review the jury’s apportionment of liability at 80% against the appellant hospital and 20% against appellant Freedman. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable jointly by appellants. In our opinion there is sufficient evidence in the record to justify the verdicts against the appellants and the apportionment of liability. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 754, 387 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minkin-v-maimonides-hospital-nyappdiv-1976.