Minkin v. Buchler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Minkin v. Buchler

232 A.D. 452, 252 N.Y.S. 110, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 A.D. 452 (Minkin v. Buchler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minkin v. Buchler, 232 A.D. 452, 252 N.Y.S. 110, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that the trial justice, having set aside the verdict rendered by him under stipulation to waive a jury trial and no jury finding being required for determination of the action, should have decided it himself on the merits. The matter is, therefore, remitted to him for that purpose.

The order so far as it directs a new trial should be reversed, without costs, and the action remitted to Trial Term for decision by the trial justice.

Present ■— Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.

Order so far as it directs a new trial reversed, without costs, and the action remitted to the Trial Term for decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI