Minkes v. Agency for Health Care Administration

836 So. 2d 1025, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15499, 2002 WL 31373864
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-2328
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 836 So. 2d 1025 (Minkes v. Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Minkes v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 836 So. 2d 1025, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15499, 2002 WL 31373864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the agency’s final order and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of the overpayment to appellant. As the validity of the agency’s action depends on disputed facts, and there was no hearing regarding the overpayment amount, the final order must be reversed. § 120.68(7)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002); see Foley v. State of Fla. Dep’t. of Health, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2029 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 11, 2002); McIntyre v. Seminole County Sch. Bd., 779 So.2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pendelton v. Witcoski
836 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
836 So. 2d 1025, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15499, 2002 WL 31373864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minkes-v-agency-for-health-care-administration-fladistctapp-2002.