Minkes v. Agency for Health Care Administration
836 So. 2d 1025, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15499, 2002 WL 31373864
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 2002·No. No. 3D01-2328·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse the agency’s final order and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of the overpayment to appellant. As the validity of the agency’s action depends on disputed facts, and there was no hearing regarding the overpayment amount, the final order must be reversed. § 120.68(7)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002); see Foley v. State of Fla. Dep’t. of Health, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2029 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 11, 2002); McIntyre v. Seminole County Sch. Bd., 779 So.2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minkes v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 836 So. 2d 1025, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15499, 2002 WL 31373864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
836 So. 2d 1025 (Minkes v. Agency for Health Care Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pendelton v. Witcoski
836 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)