Mink v. Mink

240 A.D. 943

This text of 240 A.D. 943 (Mink v. Mink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mink v. Mink, 240 A.D. 943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that there was an absence of proof sufficient to warrant the introduction of secondary evidence as to the contents of the letter claimed to have been written by the defendant to the plaintiff’s husband which the plaintiff testified that she found on her husband’s dresser in his room in Cincinnati. (Kearney v. Mayor, etc., of City of New York, 92 N. Y. 617; Cole v. Canno, 168 App. Div. 178; Wigm. Ev. [2d ed.] ¶ 1213.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kearney v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.
92 N.Y. 617 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Cole v. Canno
168 A.D. 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mink-v-mink-nyappdiv-1933.