Mining Progress, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 298
United States Customs Court·Decided December 30, 1959·No. No. 63661; protests 58/20276 and 58/24630 (B) (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles essential to the operation of a Lobbe Hobel, a continuous mining machine, similar to those the subject of Judson Sheldon Division National Carloading Corp. et al. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 19, C.D. 2061), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mining Progress, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 298 (cusc 1959).
44 Cust. Ct. 298 (Mining Progress, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Judson Sheldon Division National Carloading Corp. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 19 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)