Mining Progress, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 298
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1959
DocketNo. 63661; protests 58/20276 and 58/24630 (B) (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 298 (Mining Progress, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mining Progress, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 298 (cusc 1959).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles essential to the operation of a Lobbe Hobel, a continuous mining machine, similar to those the subject of Judson Sheldon Division National Carloading Corp. et al. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 19, C.D. 2061), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Judson Sheldon Division National Carloading Corp. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 19 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mining-progress-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1959.