Miniero v. City of New York
922 N.E.2d 884, 13 N.Y.3d 918, 895 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 146
Opinion
Motion by plaintiffs Sblendido, Parisi and Hernandez for leave to appeal denied. Motion by plaintiffs Miniero, Pepitone, Wilhelm, DePalma and Carroll, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against defendant Mine Safety Appliances Company, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Matter of Haverstraw Park v Runcible Props., 33 NY2d 637 [1973]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miniero v. City of New York, 922 N.E.2d 884, 13 N.Y.3d 918, 895 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 146 (N.Y. 2010).
922 N.E.2d 884 (Miniero v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MATTER OF HAVERSTRAW PARK, INC. v. Runcible Props. Corp.
301 N.E.2d 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)