Home/New York Court of Appeals/Miniero v. City of New York

Miniero v. City of New York

922 N.E.2d 884, 13 N.Y.3d 918, 895 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 146
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 922 N.E.2d 884 (Miniero v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miniero v. City of New York, 922 N.E.2d 884, 13 N.Y.3d 918, 895 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 146 (N.Y. 2010).

Opinion

Motion by plaintiffs Sblendido, Parisi and Hernandez for leave to appeal denied. Motion by plaintiffs Miniero, Pepitone, Wilhelm, DePalma and Carroll, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against defendant Mine Safety Appliances Company, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Matter of Haverstraw Park v Runcible Props., 33 NY2d 637 [1973]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF HAVERSTRAW PARK, INC. v. Runcible Props. Corp.
301 N.E.2d 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
922 N.E.2d 884, 13 N.Y.3d 918, 895 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miniero-v-city-of-new-york-ny-2010.