Minh Vu Hoang v. Rosen
This text of 556 F. App'x 262 (Minh Vu Hoang v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Minh Vu Hoang appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting the trustee’s turnover motion and denying her motion in limine to exclude certain expert testimony. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoang v. Rosen, No. 8:12-cv03184-DKC (D.Md. filed Sept. 6, 2013, and filed Oct. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 F. App'x 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minh-vu-hoang-v-rosen-ca4-2014.