Mingtel Inc. D/B/A Azpen Innovation v. Comerica Bank
This text of Mingtel Inc. D/B/A Azpen Innovation v. Comerica Bank (Mingtel Inc. D/B/A Azpen Innovation v. Comerica Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS -- -- -- --
NO. 22-0822 § § Dallas County, MINGTEL INC. D/B/A AZPEN § INNOVATION § 5th District. v. § COMERICA BANK §
December 16, 2022
Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.
I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioner, MINGTEL INC. D/B/A AZPEN INNOVATION, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 20th day of January, 2023.
Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk
By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mingtel Inc. D/B/A Azpen Innovation v. Comerica Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mingtel-inc-dba-azpen-innovation-v-comerica-bank-texapp-2023.